FacultyTaxonomyLinks
From UoWiki
Do you like your links structured and static, with a rigid taxonomic structure (which of course makes them a more stable bit of research), or do you prefer them to socialise, group together and be taxonimised dynamically? You have two choices here.
Contents |
[edit] recommended methodology:
1. Use http://del.icio.us to store your links, and use the taxonomy tag (see http://del.icio.us/tag/taxonomy ). Other del.icio.us tags to watch out for are:
- http://del.icio.us/tag/taxonomy
- http://del.icio.us/tag/librarianship
- http://del.icio.us/tag/databaseimaginary
- http://del.icio.us/tag/excerpt
- http://del.icio.us/tag/semweb
- http://del.icio.us/tag/rdf
- http://del.icio.us/tag/foaf
you can select a combination of these (ie, all links tagged with taxonomy AND semweb, by going to: http://del.icio.us/new/tag/taxonomy+semweb and following links from there..)
We will find a way to syndicate these directly into the wiki in due course.
- r add your own here / there
[edit] depricated methodology:
2. Add to the list below, and feel free to re-categorise and re-assign links to new categories whenever you think fit. You could leave a note in the 'summary' bit of the edit page if you feel like explaining your choice.
- r, use a mixture of these two techniques, reading from the del.icio.us tags and saving the ones you really like below. However, lists like the one below will probably get really stale, so I recommend using the recommended methodology.
[edit] Meta
[edit] Medical / Scientific
Back to FacultyTaxonomy
